The Social Security Administration (SSA) has recently revised its policy on recovering overpaid benefits, implementing a partial reversal of a controversial plan introduced in March. Originally, the SSA had announced that it would begin withholding 100% of monthly payments from beneficiaries who had been overpaid by the government.
However, following an emergency message issued on April 25, the SSA now intends to withhold 50% of monthly benefits for beneficiaries who are affected by the overpayment. This new policy applies to those receiving old-age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits.
For years, the SSA has struggled with the issue of overpayment. At times, due to administrative errors, the SSA has sent beneficiaries more money than they were entitled to. Later, the government seeks to recover these funds, often after years have passed, leading to situations where individuals are asked to repay tens of thousands of dollars. The recovery process has sometimes been extreme, with the SSA withholding 100% of a beneficiary’s monthly payments, leaving individuals without essential funds for their living expenses.
The overpayment issue has been a long-standing challenge for the SSA. The agency routinely sends out notices to recipients stating they have been overpaid, asking them to repay the funds. This process, however, has often left vulnerable beneficiaries in financial distress.
Many recipients of Social Security benefits live on fixed incomes and have little to no room to absorb the financial hit of having their payments entirely withheld. In some extreme cases, these overpayments and clawbacks have left people homeless, as they have been unable to afford necessities like food, housing, and healthcare.
In March 2024, President Biden’s administration attempted to ease the financial strain caused by overpayment clawbacks. Martin O’Malley, who President Biden appointed to head the SSA in 2023, announced that the agency would implement a policy capping the clawback rate at 10%.
This move was aimed at alleviating financial stress for beneficiaries, many of whom are elderly or disabled and rely heavily on their Social Security payments. The policy under Biden’s leadership was intended to prevent the agency from taking extreme measures to recoup funds, thus allowing people to retain a portion of their monthly benefits.
However, in March 2025, the Trump administration reversed this policy, deciding to return to the practice of withholding 100% of benefits from people who had been overpaid. Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek, appointed by the Trump administration, said that this decision was necessary to protect taxpayer dollars and ensure the government recouped the funds. The decision marked a return to a more stringent policy that had been in place under previous administrations, including those of both President Obama and the early years of President Trump’s first term.
But, following this move, the Trump administration has now partially reversed its stance. The new emergency policy, announced in April 2025, defaults to withholding 50% of monthly benefits, instead of the previously reinstated 100%.
The policy applies to overpayment notices sent to beneficiaries after April 25, 2025. According to the emergency message sent to SSA staff, the new withholding rate will be “up to 50 percent.” This means that if a recipient does not request a lower rate or challenge the withholding, the agency will begin deducting half of their benefit payments after a 90-day period.
While this policy is less severe than the previous 100% withholding rate, it still represents a significant financial burden for many recipients. Withholding even 50% of monthly benefits will cause hardship for millions of individuals who are already struggling to make ends meet.
Many of these recipients are older adults, individuals with disabilities, or those living on fixed incomes. A 50% cut in their monthly payment can leave them unable to afford essentials such as food, medicine, utilities, and housing. This can cause severe distress for those who are already living paycheck to paycheck.
O’Malley, who has been vocal in his criticism of the policy to withhold 100% of benefits, explained that even a 50% withholding rate would still have significant consequences for recipients. “If you depend entirely on your Social Security check, having half of it interrupted means what?
That means you go without paying your heating bill for the month; that means you’d go without your medicine instead of buying medicine and food,” O’Malley stated in an interview on April 28. His comments reflect a deep concern for the welfare of individuals who rely on Social Security benefits to support themselves.
Kathleen Romig, who is the director of Social Security and disability policy at the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities, echoed O’Malley’s concerns. Romig, who worked at the SSA under O’Malley, pointed out that even partial withholding would have a serious impact on beneficiaries.
She noted that many recipients of Social Security benefits already struggle to meet their basic needs, and withholding half of their monthly benefits would make it even more difficult for them to afford essentials such as housing, food, and healthcare.
The new emergency policy has also drawn criticism from advocacy groups. Kate Lang, the director of federal income security at Justice in Ageing, expressed disappointment that the SSA had not reverted to the 10% withholding rate that had been implemented under the Biden administration. Lang called the policy changes “chaotic and confusing,” noting that they created more work for the SSA staff and led to widespread uncertainty among beneficiaries.
“It creates more work for SSA – more people calling with questions, more errors being made that need to be corrected, more confusion and uncertainty about what is going on,” Lang said. This constant shifting of policies has contributed to a climate of confusion and frustration for both beneficiaries and the SSA staff who are tasked with implementing these changes.
The new policy does not apply to recipients of Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a program designed to assist people with disabilities and older adults who have limited or no income. The SSA has maintained that withholding under the SSI program will remain capped at 10 per cent.
However, for those who receive Social Security benefits under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance programs, the 50% withholding policy will remain in place unless a beneficiary requests a lower rate or challenges the policy.
This ongoing back-and-forth on overpayment recovery is emblematic of the larger challenges facing the Social Security system. The government has been struggling to balance the need to protect taxpayer funds with the goal of ensuring that vulnerable beneficiaries are not subjected to undue financial hardship. Withdrawing 50% of a beneficiary’s benefits is still viewed as a harsh policy by many advocates, who argue that it is insufficient to alleviate the burdens faced by those who rely on Social Security.
While the new policy has been somewhat softened from the previous 100% withholding plan, it is still viewed as problematic for many who depend on their Social Security payments to survive. As the SSA navigates this issue, the focus should be on finding a fair and balanced solution that considers both the need to recover overpayments and the need to protect the financial well-being of beneficiaries.
In conclusion, the Social Security Administration’s decision to revert to a 50% withholding rate for overpayments is a partial victory for beneficiaries who were facing the prospect of having their entire monthly benefits withheld.
However, the policy still causes significant financial hardship for many recipients. The question remains whether the SSA will continue to adjust its approach in the future, and whether further reforms will be implemented to provide better protection for Social Security recipients who are already struggling to make ends meet.
Disclaimer: This article has been meticulously fact-checked by our team to ensure accuracy and uphold transparency. We strive to deliver trustworthy and dependable content to our readers.
Jon King is an experienced journalist with 3 years of experience in the field. With a strong background in investigative reporting, Jon is known for his in-depth coverage of crime news, finance news, local news, and USA news. Currently working with Mikeandjonpodcast, Jon brings his sharp investigative skills, where he provides timely updates and analysis on a wide range of topics. His commitment to delivering accurate and impactful news has earned him a reputation for providing insightful and comprehensive stories that resonate with his audience.
